PROJECT 01 / ROMANIAN FOOTBALL2030–2040 HORIZON
GRASSROOTS FOOTBALL

Developing generations of outstanding footballers.

Football for the Future

A proposal for developing Romanian football · 2030–2040 horizon

We propose a system that develops competitive generations through investment in children, coaching and community infrastructure.

Grass football pitch
Illustrative photograph · MIROV / Unsplash
Children. Communities. The future.Part of Proiect România · Independent of the Romanian Football Federation (FRF)

This page is an English translation of the project presentation. The full document and executive summary are available in Romanian.

The plan. The resources.
The steps to implementation.

Download Football for the Future: the complete proposal for 2030–2040, by George Dobritoiu.

Includes the pilot, budgets, potential funding sources, financial projections, training, responsibilities and implementation annexes.

PDF63 pages · 31 chapters

9 annexes · Document in Romanian

Download the full project (PDF)Open in browser ↗Download the executive brief · 2 pages, Romanian ↓Free use, including commercially, under CC BY 4.0.

A project open for implementation.

Original materials by George Dobritoiu in Football for the Future are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. They may be shared, adapted, translated and used free of charge, including commercially, with author attribution, a link to the licence and an indication of changes, without suggesting author endorsement.

The licence covers only the author’s original materials. Unsplash photographs and materials from cited sources are excluded and retain their own terms of use.

A system that develops players.
More than a team that wins.

Invest widely at the base of the pyramid, develop talent professionally, build a pathway to senior football and reinvest the value created.

A contribution to dialogue, open to collaboration with the Romanian Football Federation (FRF), county football associations, clubs, schools and local authorities. The proposal aims to strengthen existing efforts and test complementary solutions.

The stateWe propose that it fund public benefit.

FRFWe propose that it set standards, connect stakeholders and measure results.

The communityWe propose that it provide access, with clubs developing players.

13 areas.
One shared goal.

More children being active.
More opportunities for talent.
Football built for the long term.

01

Public funding for children and grassroots football

We propose redirecting public funding from professional Superliga teams to children, youth development and community football.

Read the measures
Public money should build the base of the football pyramid. We propose ending public subsidies for the professional first teams in the Superliga and redirecting that funding to children, youth academies, community facilities, women’s and girls’ football, and the training of coaches and referees. Professional teams should cover player wages, transfer fees, agents’ fees and operating deficits through commercial revenue and private funding. Public support for a professional club’s academy must be separately budgeted, transparent and tied to measurable benefits for children; it must not subsidise the first team. We propose that the state set public funding policy and priorities, and that FRF certify sporting standards and measure outcomes, subject to agreement with the competent bodies. The aim is to develop future players and widen access to football.
02

The active child

Real participation matters more than registration numbers.

Read the measures
An active child participates in at least 30 weeks of organised activity per season, with at least 70% attendance. The pathway: initial contact → trial → registration → regular activity → development → academy → debut → integration into senior football → professional football → transfer. We measure the cost of engaging a child and the actual proportion progressing from school competitions to weekly football.
03

Football close to home

From play to professional football, with an age-appropriate pathway.

Read the measures
U6–U10: PLAY; U11–U13: DEVELOPMENT; U14–U16: TALENT; U17–U19: HIGH PERFORMANCE; U19+: PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL. Mixed teams at younger ages. Football close to home, with journeys generally around 30 minutes. Saturday and Sunday leagues. In winter: indoor football and futsal.
04

Open schools and facilities

Put existing facilities to use and cover the real operating costs.

Read the measures
Opening a sports facility involves utilities, heating, cleaning, security, staffing, insurance and administration. The facility activation package provides standard agreements and clear rules. The school benefits package transparently provides sports equipment, minor repairs and training.
05

The people who develop players

Vetted volunteers, supported coaches and an engaged community.

Read the measures
A community team: 10–20 children, 2–3 vetted adults and an affiliated club. Volunteer coaches need verified identity, an integrity certificate, child safeguarding training and a code of conduct. They receive training, equipment, insurance, mentoring and, if FRF approves the integration, a pathway towards UEFA C, without disguised remuneration. The pilot compares one coordinating coach for 8 teams with one for 12.

Read the training and capacity plan

06

Keeping children safe

Clear safeguarding rules and independent reporting channels.

Read the measures
A safeguarding lead at every youth club and a coordinator at each county football association. Rules covering two-adult supervision, changing rooms, transport, photos and video, communication, accommodation and travel. A separate integrity channel for unofficial payments, favouritism and fraud. An independent channel for abuse and risks to children.

Read the training and capacity plan

07

Developing talent fairly

Progress, education and the opportunity to reach senior football.

Read the measures
Monitor relative age effects and biological maturation. Multiple assessments are used only for major selections. On 31 October 2024, FRF announced the launch of a regional U14 scouting project ahead of U15 selection. Its current status must be confirmed with FRF; the proposed local centres would complement approved structures with regular additional training. FRF source · 2024. Academies are assessed through progress, education, retention, debuts and senior playing minutes.
08

Romanians around the world

Extend and professionalise connections with young players abroad.

Read the measures
We propose using the existing FRF registration platform, subject to FRF agreement and authorised access, with country coordinators, vetted observers, comparable assessments and support for families. The pathway covers eligibility checks, match observations, technical assessment and invitations decided exclusively by the FRF. Children are observed close to home; travel to Romania requires confirmed funding, including an accompanying adult. The same pathway applies to girls. Identification starts at U13, with structured observation at U14–U19. U21 and senior squads sit outside this network. Published priorities cover eligibility, the sporting window and competition level; distance is used for logistical planning. Chapter 15 details selection, data protection and club relationships; chapter 31 separates this component’s budget from the community pilot.

Read the diaspora programme in the full document (Romanian)

09

A shared digital system

Track attendance, outcomes and funding through an accessible platform.

Read the measures
A mobile-friendly platform that works with a weak signal, supports audits and data exports, and avoids dependence on a single supplier. It covers identity and consent, squads, attendance, matches, a funding register, safeguarding, reporting concerns and a monitoring dashboard. The funding register tracks: source → programme → beneficiary → expenditure → evidence → outcome.
10

Costs and funding

Transparent assumptions. No contribution from vulnerable families.

Read the measures
Working model at 2026 prices: €420 per occupied place per year in variable costs, plus regional and central coordination, new-place setup and contingency. At 10,000 stable places, the full estimate is €5.28 million per year. Vulnerable families contribute nothing. The full document sets out formulas, potential funding routes and three scenarios for 2030–2040. These are planning estimates, not approved funding.

Read the training and capacity plan

11

Start with a pilot

21 months: preparation, 12 months of activities and evaluation.

Read the measures
One municipality and 4–6 rural communes; around 400 children, 25 teams and 60 local adults. Six months of preparation, 12 months of activities and three months of evaluation. Indicative base budget: €327,130, plus a rounded 15% contingency, giving a €376,200 ceiling. It includes the local coordinator in months 4–18, technical coordination preparation in months 4–6 and the training specified in the model. The manager handles continuity in months 19–21. Shared costs are counted once. Quotes, eligibility and full funding must be confirmed before delivery.

Read the training and capacity plan

12

Expand only with evidence

Assessment, a pilot and expansion based on results and resources.

Read the measures
Stage 0: assess the current situation. Stage 1: pilot → CONTINUE / ADAPT / STOP. Stage 2: 5,000–10,000 occupied places. Stage 3: 25,000–50,000 occupied places. Nationwide expansion takes place only if resources allow. George Dobritoiu is the strategy’s author and makes his materials freely available for adaptation and implementation. The author receives no remuneration for use of the documentation. The author and his associated companies do not participate in implementation contracts.

Read the training and capacity plan

13

Measure what matters

Indicators at 1, 4 and 8 years from the start of activities with children.

Read the measures
Year 1: retention, attendance, cost per child, volunteers, safeguarding and platform use. Year 4: proportion of active U6–U12 children, girls, rural participation, coaches, referees, facilities opened, debuts and integration into senior football. Year 8: players developed, professional playing minutes, contribution to U21 and senior squads, diaspora integration, transfer value and reinvestment.

Summary of the proposal for developing Romanian football. The detailed measures reflect the source document. Figures are taken from that document and are not an updated statistical assessment.

Developing the people who develop football

Grassroots football grows through the people who make it possible: coaches, referees, safeguarding leads, administrators and volunteers. Team numbers cannot grow without training, mentoring and supervision capacity. We propose a trainer-development programme built with the competent FRF and county association structures, developing people and reorganising existing capacity on the basis of results.

National specialistsRegional trainersLocal practitioners
1. Assess capacity and performance

Before setting the programme’s scale, assess each specialism and county over a 3–5-year reference period agreed before data collection. Map available trainers, qualifications and time commitments; course capacity, costs and geographical coverage; applicants, graduates and active practitioners; community needs and training facilities.

Also measure time to qualification, graduate activity at 12 and 24 months, cost per active practitioner and response times for access or accreditation applications. Record missing data and begin collecting it. Publish the methodology, data limitations and aggregated results.

Findings may lead to curriculum improvements, additional trainer development, simpler procedures and resource reallocation through the competent bodies. Publish performance criteria in advance. Address professional shortcomings through notification, support and a remedial period, followed by reassessment and a reasoned decision with an appeal route. Risks to children and serious misconduct require immediate protective measures without waiting for these stages.

2. Build a national team of specialists

The national team develops the curriculum, prepares regional trainers and monitors quality. Transparently select specialists in Romania, Romanian professionals working in academies and sports organisations abroad and, where needed, international experts. Seek technical support from UEFA, FIFA, federations and academies without presenting unconfirmed partnerships as guaranteed.

The programme strengthens and, where justified by assessment, reorganises existing capacity with the competent FRF and county association structures. Each specialism has its own lead: coaching expertise does not automatically confer expertise in refereeing, safeguarding or administration.

3. Select a new generation of trainers

Recruit through county associations and open applications, with published criteria, selection stages and appeal procedures. Actively attract people aged 20–30 without excluding strong candidates of other ages. Experienced specialists can serve as trainers, mentors and assessors.

Selection considers specialist competence, communication and teaching ability, integrity, role-specific checks, availability for work in the region and a realistic local involvement plan. Nomination by a county association does not guarantee admission.

4. Two pathways: trainers and practitioners

REGIONAL TRAINERS. The working assumption is a 6–12-month pathway adapted to specialism and experience. It may include two national intensive modules in Bucharest or other centres, each lasting up to one–two weeks, alongside remote study, local practice and mentoring. Validate duration and frequency in the pilot and budget for participants’ time and expenses. Assessment includes practical competence and a teaching demonstration. Graduation and authorisation permit teaching within the programme only in the approved specialism and scope.

LOCAL PRACTITIONERS AND VOLUNTEERS. Training duration is proportionate to the role and applicable requirements. Delivery is close to home, including weekends, combining accessible remote theory with practice and field assessment. Graduates undertake only tasks for which they have demonstrated competence, with necessary supervision and mandatory qualifications. They do not automatically gain the right to train or certify others.

Online learning supports theory without replacing practical demonstrations, teaching interaction or field assessment.

5. Distinct specialisms, shared standards of conduct

COACHES: teaching, child development, session planning, inclusion, parent communication and age-appropriate technical skills.

REFEREES: applying the laws of the game, match management, communication, conflict management and incident reporting.

CHILD SAFEGUARDING: risk prevention, recognising concerns, receiving reports, confidentiality and referral to the competent people or institutions. Require the behavioural integrity certificate for roles subject to the legal obligation and explicitly define checks for each category, including volunteers. Checks do not replace training and supervision.

ADMINISTRATORS AND COORDINATORS: organisation, the digital platform, records, budgets, financial transparency and volunteer coordination.

VOLUNTEERS: clear responsibilities, conduct, safety, inclusion and role boundaries, with access to guidance.

Ethics, safeguarding and conduct form a shared core. Specialist training and assessment remain distinct.

6. A controlled cascade with two training transfers

The national team trains and supports regional trainers. Regional trainers prepare and mentor local practitioners. Local practitioners deliver activities in clubs, schools and communities.

Three levels mean two training transfers. Practitioners may later become trainers only after additional preparation, assessment and authorisation. Teaching rights do not pass on automatically. All levels use common, centrally updated curricula, materials and criteria; local adaptations are documented and preserve essential standards.

7. Independent assessment and links to official pathways

Attendance alone is insufficient. Assess knowledge, practical demonstrations, supervised activity and, for trainers, teaching ability. Final assessors are independent of the candidate’s direct trainer; decisions are reasoned and open to appeal.

Distinguish attendance confirmation, competence certification, programme teaching authorisation and the right to assess or award official qualifications. Programme certification does not replace mandatory licences or qualifications. For coaches, seek recognition of eligible components within the official UEFA C pathway under FRF-approved conditions; this is a negotiated objective, not a promised equivalence.

While formal partnerships are pending, prepare materials and offer introductory activities in administration, volunteering and safeguarding with competent partners and within applicable requirements. These activities do not automatically confer official qualifications.

8. Support continued community involvement

Each graduate has a clear local role, a mentor and access to materials, support and ongoing development. Budget for participation and activity expenses. Clearly separate paid roles from volunteering, with transparent responsibilities and conditions.

Young referees receive mentoring at their first matches and clear procedures for reporting and responding to intimidation or violence. Do not judge trainers solely by pass rates or automatically impose repayment obligations on volunteers. Assess practice quality, graduate activity, compliance with standards and community progress. Reassess trainers periodically against published criteria.

9. Pilot, budget and conditions for expansion

Align the first training programme with the community pilot. Candidate numbers and specialisms follow pilot needs and available mentoring and assessment capacity. Schedule training so that essential staff are ready before the activities they lead.

Set the budget after the capacity assessment and present it separately: selection, trainers, travel, accommodation, materials, venues, practice, assessment, coordination and post-course support. Count shared community-pilot costs once only. Secure funding for additional costs before committing to activities; existing pilot estimates are not automatically sufficient for the new component.

Track practical competence, active graduates at 6 and 12 months, observed field quality, cost per graduate and active practitioner, continuity of coaches, referees and volunteers, safeguarding compliance and feedback from children, parents and organisations. Continue monitoring at 24 months where cohorts allow.

Set success thresholds before the pilot. Compare results with each area’s starting point and resources. Do not open more teams than can be safely trained, supported and supervised. Develop the people, demonstrate field capacity, then expand.

Start locally.
Show that it works.

One municipality and 4–6 rural communes. 21 months in total, including 12 months of activities with children. The main outcome: how many children continue to participate after one year, measured separately from the active-child attendance threshold.

400U8 / U10 children, approximately
25teams, approximately
60local adults, approximately
12 monthschildren’s activities; 21 months total

The expanded model includes trainer development and local training, without counting shared costs twice. All costs require validation through quotes. Construction and later components have separate budgets.

WORKING PILOT BUDGET

€376,200

Ceiling including a 15% contingency.
Base budget: €327,130.

Full funding before the start.

The pilot starts only after all funding has been contractually secured. At the end, the decision is explicit:

CONTINUEADAPTSTOP

Transparent costs.
Real access.

Vulnerable families contribute nothing.

Planning estimates that need validation. The pilot budget is shown separately and is not simply the annual per-child cost multiplied by the number of children.

€420variable cost / occupied place / year

Coordination, new-place setup and contingency are additional. Figures use 2026 prices and exclude major capital investment.

Stable network with no annual growth; 10% contingency included
Occupied placesEstimated annual budget
10,000€5.28 million
50,000€25.08 million
100,000€49.94 million

Annual expansion scenarios and economic costs are detailed in the full document.

Expansion is earned.
Through results.

STAGE 0

Understand the situation

Assess resources, real costs and available facilities.

STAGE 1

Test the model

Run the pilot and decide whether to continue, adapt or stop.

STAGE 2

5,000–10,000 occupied places

Expand based on evidence and available resources.

STAGE 3

25,000–50,000 occupied places

Grow gradually. Nationwide expansion depends on resources.

What we track from the start of activities

1 year

Retention, attendance, cost per child, volunteers, safeguarding and platform use.

4 years

Active U6–U12 children, girls, rural participation, coaches, referees, facilities opened and integration into senior football.

8 years

Players developed, professional playing minutes, contribution to representative squads, diaspora participation, transfers and reinvestment.

Trust is built
on clear rules.

What information is needed before nationwide approval?
Detailed FRF finances; UEFA/FIFA allocations; the distribution of coaches and referees; an inventory of school sports clubs, sports-focused secondary schools and facilities; actual costs for halls, insurance, equipment and transport; family expenses; sponsor and local authority capacity; and a full diaspora audit.
How is public funding tracked?
The funding register tracks the source, programme, beneficiary, expenditure, evidence and outcome. Public development funding serves the community rather than senior player wages, transfers, agents or first-team deficits.
What commitment does the author make?
George Dobritoiu makes the project freely available for adaptation and implementation. The author receives no remuneration for use of the documentation. The author and his associated companies do not participate in implementation contracts.

Help turn the proposal into practice.

Become a contributor

An idea worth sharing.
A system to build together.

Contribute to the project

Get in touch